Key result
Nationwide survey reveals profound variability in PTCA periprocedural routines including heparin dosing and ACT monitoring.
Cross-Sectional
Yes
Significant variability exists in periprocedural routines for coronary angioplasty across Israeli catheterization laboratories, suggesting a need to standardize practices to improve patient comfort and reduce costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Marked variability in PTCA routines leaves standardization needs open; prospective trials required before clinical adoption.
Our objective was to evaluate the current trends of coronary angioplasty periprocedural care in the state of Israel. PTCA technology has undergone through some major developments and refinements, which have yielded new algorithms and routines. With this shift of paradigms, some of the periprocedural routines (these include medications and dosing before, during and after the procedure, as well as the handling of anti-coagulation, femoral sheath removal and the extent of patient monitoring post-PTCA) have been partially re-established. In order to assess trends in periprocedural care, we elected to analyze the current state of practice in the state of Israel. A questionnaire was sent to every cardiac catheterization laboratory in Israel that performs PTCA. An authorized senior cardiologist representing the laboratory submitted the information required for our survey. A nurse-to-nurse telephone questionnaire was conducted simultaneously to cross-examine the validity of the data. All centers submitted results. The average heparin dose for PTCA varied between 5000 and 15 000 units, ACT was monitored routinely by some and not at all by others, post-PTCA heparin administration was routinely administered by some institutions and not by others, and the mean femoral sheath dwell time ranged from 4 to 18 h. Post-PTCA cardiac monitoring varied from 6 to more than 24 h. Some institutions prescribed to all patients nitrates, calcium channel blockers and low-molecular-weight heparin, while others did not. We conclude that there is profound variability in the periprocedural routines that may translate into a significant cost increase, patient discomfort, a prolonged monitoring and hospital stay, and potential patient morbidity. We suggest that these routines should be critically evaluated, and that if they do not contribute to the procedural success and patient well-being they should be abandoned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaluski et al. (1998) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Periprocedural care routines was evaluated on Trends and variability in periprocedural care routines. A nationwide survey of Israeli catheterization laboratories revealed profound variability in PTCA periprocedural routines, including heparin dosing, ACT monitoring, and sheath dwell times.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: