Key result
Seven-predictor nomogram predicts in-hospital mortality in critically ill MI and AF patients with ~0.81 AUC.
Why the study?
Myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation frequently co-occur in critically ill patients with a complex bidirectional relationship, prompting the development of a nomogram to predict in-hospital mortality.
Can a 7-variable nomogram accurately predict in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=1,240)
Can a 7-variable nomogram accurately predict in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation?
A 7-variable nomogram can accurately predict the risk of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with concurrent myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, aiding in early risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nomogram shows acceptable discrimination for mortality in MI-AF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) and atrial fibrillation (AF), a common complication during hospitalisation of critically ill MI patients, have a complex and close bidirectional relationship, and the two frequently occur together. AIM: To develop a nomogram to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with MI and AF. STUDY DESIGN: For this retrospective cohort research, we selected 1240 critically ill patients with AF and MI from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) (version 3.1) database. A 7:3 random division of the dataset was made into training and test sets. LASSO regression plus 10-fold cross-validation was used to screen predictors, and multivariate logistic regression was used to build prediction models using the screened predictors. We assessed our outcome model using the calibration curve and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). We assessed the clinical usefulness of the predictive models using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: This study included 1240 patients with both MI and AF, of whom 212 died during hospitalisation, yielding a mortality rate of 17.1%. The final seven predictors were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, continuous renal replacement therapy, metoprolol, vasopressor use, red blood cell distribution width, anion gap and blood urea nitrogen. The model achieved an Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.802 in the training set and 0.814 in the test set. Both calibration and decision curves demonstrated good model performance. CONCLUSION: For patients with MI and AF, this nomogram offers an early evaluation of the risk of inpatient death. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: By utilising risk prediction algorithms, nurses may precisely evaluate the risk of early mortality in patients with MI and AF promptly and execute targeted preventative interventions. This method enhances nursing decision-making and resource distribution, demonstrating clinical significance in critical care practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation (n=1,240). Seven-predictor nomogram was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (AUC 0.814). A seven-predictor nomogram successfully predicted in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation, achieving an AUC of 0.814 in the test set.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: