Key result
Tirofiban fails to improve post-PCI coronary flow or reduce cTnT versus placebo in diabetic patients.
Why the study?
Does tirofiban improve post-PCI coronary flow and reduce post-PCI myocardial infarction in stable diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI?
RCT (n=46)
randomized
Does tirofiban improve post-PCI coronary flow and reduce post-PCI myocardial infarction in stable diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 10.2% vs 12%
p-value: p=0.30
In stable diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI, the addition of high-dose tirofiban to dual antiplatelet therapy did not improve coronary flow or reduce post-procedural myonecrosis.
Does not support routine tirofiban use in stable diabetic elective PCI; confirms lack of benefit on coronary flow or post-procedural myonecrosis.
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses of trials enrolling acute coronary syndrome patients suggest that inhibition of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa can improve the outcome of diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), possibly by improving microvascular perfusion. However, the efficacy of small-molecule IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors to improve microvascular perfusion in stable diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI has not been specifically investigated. METHODS: We randomized consecutive stable diabetic patients, undergoing elective PCI, to tirofiban or placebo groups along with double antiplatelet therapy. High-dose bolus (25 microg/kg per 3 min) of tirofiban was administered immediately before PCI followed by 8 h continuous infusion (0.15 microg/kg per min). Postprocedural myonecrosis was assessed prospectively by measurement of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) at 6 and 24 h after PCI. The primary end-points were post-PCI coronary flow estimated by corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count and post-PCI myocardial infarction. Platelet aggregation was measured by platelet function analyser-100 values. RESULTS: Forty-six patients entered the study (22 randomized to placebo and 24 randomized to tirofiban). The study drug was associated with a significant increase of platelet function analyser-100 values that peaked immediately after PCI and was maintained at 6 h (pre-PCI: 131 +/- 65 s; post-PCI: 222 +/- 49 s; after 6 h: 219 +/- 55 s).Post-PCI corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count was similar in tirofiban and in placebo groups (10.2 +/- 3.6 vs. 12.0 +/- 7.6, P = 0.30, respectively). The prevalence of raised cTnT levels was similar in the two groups (25 vs. 30%, P = 0.56, respectively). At multivariate analysis, direct stenting (associated with reduced myonecrosis) and postdilatation (associated with increased myonecrosis) predicted cTnT elevation. CONCLUSION: A high-dose bolus of tirofiban in stable diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI, along with double antiplatelet therapy, was associated with a significant further inhibition of platelet aggregation which, however, did not translate in a lower incidence of post-PCI distal embolization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talarico et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in stable diabetic patients undergoing elective PCI (n=46). Tirofiban vs. Placebo was evaluated on post-PCI coronary flow estimated by corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (p=0.30). Tirofiban did not significantly improve post-PCI coronary flow frame count (10.2 vs 12.0, P=0.30) or reduce raised cTnT levels (25% vs 30%, P=0.56) compared to placebo in diabetic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: