Key result
Learning health systems workshop enables delegates to develop six quality improvement projects for acute care.
Why the study?
Poor quality of care causes excess morbidity and mortality in LMICs, but capacity for interdisciplinary quality improvement methodology tailored to setting-specific priorities is limited.
A learning health systems approach and international workshop successfully facilitated the collaborative development of six quality improvement projects for acute care in South Asia.
QI training without stakeholder buy-in may fail to build capacity in LMICs; leaves open effective implementation strategies for prospective evaluation.
Poor quality of care is a leading cause of excess morbidity and mortality in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs). Improving the quality of healthcare is complex, and requires an interdisciplinary team equipped with the skills to design, implement and analyse setting-relevant improvement interventions. Such capacity is limited in many LMICs. However, training for healthcare workers in quality improvement (QI) methodology without buy-in from multidisciplinary stakeholders and without identifying setting-specific priorities is unlikely to be successful. The Care Quality Improvement Network (CQIN) was established between Network for Improving Critical care Systems and Training (NICST) and University College London Centre for Perioperative Medicine, with the aim of building capacity for research and QI. A two-day international workshop, in collaboration with the College of Surgeons of Sri Lanka, was conducted to address the above deficits. Innovatively, the CQIN adopts a learning health systems (LHS) approach to improving care by leveraging information captured through the NICST electronic multi-centre acute and critical care surveillance platform. Fifty-two delegates from across the CQIN representing clinical, civic and academic healthcare stakeholders from six countries attended the workshop. Mapping of care processes enabled identification of barriers and drivers to the delivery of care and facilitated the selection of feasible QI methods and matrices. Six projects, reflecting key priorities for improving the delivery of acute care in Asia, were collaboratively developed: improving assessment of postoperative pain; optimising sedation in critical care; refining referral of deteriorating patients; reducing surgical site infection after caesarean section; reducing surgical site infection after elective general surgery; and improving provision of timely electrocardiogram recording for patients presenting with signs of acute myocardial infarction. Future project implementation and evaluation will be supported with resources and expertise from the CQIN partners. This LHS approach to building capacity for QI may be of interest to others seeing to improve care in LMICs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beane et al. (2019) studied Quality of healthcare in LMICs (n=52). Learning health systems (LHS) approach and quality improvement workshop was evaluated on Development of quality improvement projects. A two-day international workshop using a learning health systems approach enabled 52 delegates to collaboratively develop six quality improvement projects for acute care in Asia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: