Key result
Pre-PCI stress testing remains underutilized in stable CAD, potentially driving procedures without clinical benefit.
Why the study?
Does stress testing prior to percutaneous coronary intervention improve patient selection in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Does stress testing prior to percutaneous coronary intervention improve patient selection in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Despite guideline recommendations, pre-PCI stress testing is underutilized in patients with stable coronary artery disease, potentially leading to unnecessary procedures.
May support efforts to increase pre-PCI stress testing in stable CAD; leaves open whether routine use improves outcomes.
The majority of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) are carried out in nonurgent situations, primarily in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Recent trials have concluded that for patients with stable coronary artery disease, treatment with optimal medical therapy versus optimal medical therapy plus PCI yields equivalent outcomes in terms of morbidity and future risk of myocardial infarction. Since PCI is a procedure with risk, it is important to identify patients for whom the benefit of the procedure outweighs the harms. PCI may be beneficial in certain subgroups, such as patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia on noninvasive testing. Although current guidelines require documentation of ischemia prior to elective PCI and this strategy is cost effective, pre-PCI stress testing appears to be underutilized, potentially leading to PCI being performed in patients who may not derive benefit from the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2009) conducted a review in Stable coronary artery disease. Pre-PCI stress testing was evaluated. Pre-PCI stress testing appears to be underutilized in patients with stable coronary artery disease, potentially leading to procedures in patients who may not derive benefit.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: