Key result
Dysglycemia is linked to up to ~46% greater low-attenuation plaque volume vs normal glycemia.
Why the study?
Differences in coronary plaque composition and burden between normal glycemic status and dysglycemia, including impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, were not fully defined.
Is dysglycemia (IGT and T2DM) associated with increased low-attenuation plaque burden compared to normal glycemic status in patients with suspected CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=355)
Is dysglycemia (IGT and T2DM) associated with increased low-attenuation plaque burden compared to normal glycemic status in patients with suspected CAD?
p-value: p=<0.02
Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with a similar increase in high-risk low-attenuation coronary plaque burden as established type 2 diabetes, highlighting the need for early metabolic intervention.
May support early intervention in impaired glucose tolerance; extends cross-sectional plaque data but leaves causal effects open.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in plaque composition and burden between normal glycemic status (NGS) and dysglycemia expressed as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: Clinically indicated coronary computed tomography angiography was used to evaluate patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). An oral glucose tolerance test was performed to assess glycemic status. Patients were stratified as NGS, IGT, and T2DM. Plaque volumes were quantified using validated software, with further compositional measurements of low-attenuation, non-calcified, and calcified plaque burden. Results: Of 355 patients with suspected CAD, 220 had NGS, 92 were diagnosed with IGT, and 43 with known T2DM. Low-attenuation plaque volume was significantly higher in IGT (209 mm3, p < 0.02) and T2DM (243 mm3, p = 0.005) compared with NGS (166 mm3). Total plaque burden was similar between all groups, but a significantly greater low-attenuation plaque burden was seen in IGT (p = 0.03) and T2DM (p = 0.02) compared with NGS. The multivariate linear regression model adjusted for clinical risk factors showed that patients with IGT had a greater low-attenuation plaque burden compared with those with NGS (p = 0.03). Interestingly, no significant differences in plaque burdens were observed between those with IGT and T2DM in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Dysglycemia, including impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus, was associated with increased low-attenuation plaque burden compared with normal glycemic status. Patients with IGT demonstrated plaque burden similar to patients with known T2DM, underscoring the need for early metabolic intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersen et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Suspected coronary artery disease (n=355). Dysglycemia (impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes mellitus) vs. Normal glycemic status was evaluated on Low-attenuation plaque volume (p=<0.02). Impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes were associated with higher low-attenuation plaque volumes (209 mm3 and 243 mm3) compared to normal glycemic status (166 mm3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: