A Study on Factors for Promoting Dual-Location Living

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

Private support programs for dual-location living effectively reduce economic and psychological barriers through low-cost operations using vacant houses and community interaction, but require collaborative experience design and sustainable business models to foster deeper engagement with regional issues. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

Reina Tanabe; Katsuya Uozaki

doi:10.11361/reportscpij.25.2_255

September 9, 2026Toshi keikaku hokokushu/Toshi keikaku houkokushuuOpen Access

A Study on Factors for Promoting Dual-Location Living

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To analyze the characteristics and effectiveness of private-sector initiatives aimed at reducing financial and psychological barriers to dual-location living between urban and rural areas.
Conducted a case study evaluation of two private dual-location support initiatives: TENJIKU and trial migration experience programs.
Assessed how free temporary lodging and local experiential activities mitigate barriers to multi-base living and repurpose vacant buildings.
Repurposing vacant houses and existing architecture enabled low-cost program management while generating rental revenue and utilization benefits for local property owners.
Participating visitors gained opportunities to interact with community members, though experiential programs remained limited to auxiliary tasks rather than addressing core regional challenges.
Achieving viable long-term programs requires collaborative experience design between residents and visitors along with transitioning from early public funding to self-sustaining private business models.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Case study demonstrates that subsidized temporary stays lower participation barriers for dual-location living, suggesting sustainable models require deeper resident-visitor collaboration.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Tanabe et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa51e9d327956e4761f86b8 https://doi.org/10.11361/reportscpij.25.2_255

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

A Study on Factors for Promoting Dual-Location Living

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

A Study on Factors for Promoting Dual-Location Living

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading