Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Techno-economic modeling reveals viable electricity costs for riverine hydrokinetic turbines under uncertainty, suggesting potential for remote off-grid power.
Transitioning toward sustainable power generation requires robust models for emerging technologies like riverine hydrokinetic energy, which are often hindered by technical and financial uncertainties. This study presents a site-specific techno-economic analysis (TEA) of a conceptual hydrokinetic system for the Davao River, Philippines, utilizing a probabilistic Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) framework. Unlike traditional deterministic models that rely on fixed point-estimates, this research employs a Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) to account for inherent volatility in resource availability and capital expenditures. The methodology integrates high-fidelity hydrokinetic resource assessments from three specific sites—A, B, and C—with stochastic financial modeling of 3-kW riverine horizontal-axis cross-flow turbine. Results indicate that Site A exhibits the highest potential energy yield with an annual production of 15,785 kWh and a competitive capacity factor of 60%. The probabilistic simulation yields a mean LCOE of 0.481 USD/kWh, with a standard deviation of 0.0766 USD/kWh. The concentration of outcomes between 0.40 and 0.55 USD/kWh establishes an economic confidence band for the project's feasibility. These findings demonstrate that hydrokinetic systems are economically viable for distributed or off-grid applications in the Philippines, providing a scalable template for future renewable energy assessments in high-uncertainty environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ken Cosares (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: