Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study reveals high content validity of the adapted AIQ-21 in chronic aphasia, highlighting widespread psychosocial impacts across daily communication, participation, and emotional health.
In Hungary, aphasia assessment relies primarily on impairment-based language measures. However, no aphasia-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is currently available to assess the impact of aphasia on everyday communication, participation, and psychological well-being. This study aimed to (1) adapt the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 (AIQ-21) to Hungarian, (2) evaluate the content validity of the Hungarian version (AIQ-21-H), and (3) explore the impact of aphasia on communication, participation, and psychological well-being, and their associations with aphasia severity. Adaptation involved semi-structured interviews and focus groups with six people with aphasia (PWA). In the content validity phase, 13 PWA and 12 professionals rated relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness of the AIQ-21-H. Content validity indices ranged from 0.92-1.00 for PWA and 0.75-1.00 for professionals, indicating high content validity. Thirty-four PWA with chronic aphasia reported difficulties in communication (especially reading and writing), participation (everyday tasks, maintaining friendships), and emotional well-being (frustration, worry, helplessness, and anger). Communication and participation were strongly associated, psychological well-being was moderately associated with both domains, and greater aphasia severity was associated with greater difficulties across all AIQ-21-H domains. The AIQ-21-H is the first aphasia-specific, aphasia-friendly PROM in Hungarian and offers a much needed tool for clinical practice and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zakariás et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: