Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Philosophical textual analysis reveals Xunzi's concept of evil nature stems from a conflict between animal instincts and sociality, suggesting morality arises from deliberate effort.
The Chapter ‘Human Nature is Evil’ (Xing E 性惡)Footnote1 is a crucial text in the Xunzi that centrally addresses the theory of human nature. Unlike Mencius’s concept of ‘nature’ (xing 性), Xunzi’s discussion of ‘nature’ primarily encompasses three levels: animal instincts, cognitive faculties, and the social attribute of ‘sociality’ (qun 群), none of which includes innate moral attributes. Xunzi’s argument that human nature is evil is a value judgment grounded in the human social attribute (‘sociality’) and made possible by the cognitive capacity of the ‘heart-mind’ (xin 心). Therefore, xing e actually refers to the contradiction within human nature between its animalistic and social components. This contradiction must be apprehended through the cognitive function of the heart-mind and resolved through the social practical activity of ‘deliberate effort’ (wei 偽).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: