Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Panel causality analysis reveals unidirectional effects of financial development on economic growth across ten Sub-Saharan African nations, highlighting the need for tailored economic policies.
This study employs the bootstrap panel Granger causality approach to re-examine the causal relationship between financial development and economic growth in 10 Sub-Saharan African lower-middle-income countries over 1990–2023. The results provide evidence in support of the demand-following and supply-leading hypotheses, as well as instances of non-causality, reflecting considerable heterogeneity across countries. At the aggregate panel level, however, a unidirectional causal relationship is observed running from financial development to economic growth, lending support to the supply-leading hypothesis. The panel-level result is best interpreted as an average effect that reflects the dominance of the supply-leading pattern in the majority of countries rather than its uniform applicability across the sample. The findings suggest that financial sector policies should be conditional on country-specific structural and institutional features, rather than relying on uniform prescriptions that assume a single causal direction across economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gachin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: