Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational analysis reveals that small-world topology depends on transformation methods across biological time series, suggesting it is not a universal dynamic property.
Small-world topology is usually interpreted in connectivity networks, but graphs derived from individual time series have different node and edge semantics. We examined how three common time-series representations—Quantile Graphs (QG), Gramian Angular Fields (GAF), and Markov Transition Fields (MTF)—shape the topology inferred from single-signal data. We analyzed stochastic and deterministic synthetic series, including a logistic-map benchmark spanning periodic, chaotic, and period-3-window regimes, together with functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography, calcium imaging, simulated microelectrode-array recordings, and physiological signals. For the primary biological analyses, each representation was converted to a Q -node undirected binary graph at fixed 10% density, and small-worldness was quantified relative to degree-preserving random graphs. Small-world classification was not representation invariant: QG most often yielded σ >1 , GAF was below the σ =1 criterion in most datasets, and MTF showed mixed or near-threshold behavior. In the logistic-map benchmark and an iterative amplitude-adjusted Fourier transform surrogate analysis, topology depended jointly on dynamics and representation. These results show that small-world organization in graphs derived from individual time series is a representation-dependent signature of nonlinear temporal structure rather than a universal property of biological dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alves et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: