Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal study reveals that 60-degree upper eyelid wrinkle dominance tracks periorbital ageing in women, indicating a new quantitative metric for cosmetic evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: Periorbital ageing, manifested by wrinkles, exerts significant influence on perceived age and attractiveness, making this a primary target for anti-ageing interventions. Previous quantitative assessments of periorbital ageing have predominantly focused on the number or depth of wrinkles. In this study, we aimed to develop a novel approach to quantify age-related changes in the orientation of wrinkles on the upper eyelids. METHODS: This longitudinal study (2010-2019) involved 87 healthy Japanese women (aged 22-62 years) with up to nine time points. Facial images were captured by the VISIA-Evolution system and expert-rated wrinkle scores were generated for multiple facial regions. Images of the left upper eyelid were analysed by morphological opening to decompose the wrinkle line segments into six directions (0° to 150° from vertical). We then defined a wrinkle dominance index (WDI) for each direction and investigated its association with age and expert-rated wrinkle scores. RESULTS: Of the six directions, only the 60° WDI showed an evident age-related increase (r = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.64); furthermore, this trend accelerated after 40 years of age. Participants ≥ 40 years of age with higher 60° WDI values exhibited significantly higher expert-rated wrinkle scores for the right lateral periorbital area (p < 0.05) and lower eyelids (p < 0.05) after adjusting for age. No significant associations were identified for non-periorbital facial regions. CONCLUSION: The 60° WDI of the upper eyelid represents a quantitative indicator of periorbital ageing progression. This image-based, orientation-specific metric provides a practical tool for the objective evaluation of periorbital skin ageing in both clinical and cosmetic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suematsu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: