Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual analysis highlights immediate youth leadership models in African church and civic settings, indicating that active empowerment fosters reconciliation and human flourishing.
The widespread use of “Next Generation” in African church and civic discourse has, unintentionally, fostered a culture of postponement that delays youth leadership and diminishes their present contributions. This article proposes a paradigm shift to Generation Now (Gen Now), affirming young people as Christ's reconciling presence within contexts of systemic violence, exclusion, and fragile trust. Drawing on Eliza Filby's generational identity framework, McDowell and Wallace's call for worldview formation, and Andrew Root's pastoral realism, the study situates youth leadership at the intersection of theology, sociology, and peace studies. Engaging Emmanuel Katongole, Francis Fukuyama, and Johan Galtung, alongside Elias Opongo and Joseph Ola, it highlights reconciliation, trust, and positive peace as foundations for transformation. Biblical narratives reinforce this vision. The article contends that empowering Gen Now through mentoring, discipleship, and leadership pathways is both a theological imperative and a practical path toward justice, reconciliation, and human flourishing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esayas Ersabo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: