Retrospective cohort study reveals accurate prediction of self-harm in adolescents after traumatic brain injury, highlighting opportunities for targeted post-acute support.
OBJECTIVE: Few prognostic models are available to assess risks of adverse outcomes among traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients beyond acute care. Self-harm is an important adverse outcome with modifiable risk factors. The authors developed and validated a risk model for self-harm after TBI in adolescence. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the authors utilized a population-linked dataset based in Wales (the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank). It included adolescents ages 10-24 years who sought health care services with a diagnosis of TBI between January 1, 2009, and October 16, 2023. Cox regression analysis was used to develop a prediction model for the association between risk factors and time to self-harm, with optimism-corrected bootstrapping for internal validation. Model performance was assessed as discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: In total, 34,092 adolescents were in the model development cohort, of whom 538 (1.6%) and 1,202 (3.5%) had recorded self-harm episodes within 1 year and 3 years of the index TBI, respectively. Twelve predictors were included in the risk model, including a history of self-harm, psychiatric conditions, and substance use as strong predictors. The optimism-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.74 at 1 year and 0.72 at 3 years post-TBI. The model demonstrated good calibration at both time horizons. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model based on data from electronic health records could accurately predict self-harm risk after adolescent TBI. Further research is needed to assess the model's clinical utility and transportability. Use of a prognostic model may assist clinical decision making about risk and resource allocation after TBI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogonah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: