Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective observational study uncovers limited accuracy of standard risk scores for pulmonary complications in one-lung ventilation surgery, highlighting the need for specialized models.
Background Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are common after thoracic surgery performed with one-lung ventilation (OLV). Although risk scores such as ARISCAT, ASA physical status, and LAS VEGAS are used to predict PPC in general surgery, their performance in thoracic surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of these scores to predict PPCs. Methods This prospective observational study included 115 adult patients undergoing noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring OLV. The primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital PPCs within 30 days. We assessed the discriminatory ability of risk scores using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve (AUC)) and identified independent predictors with multivariable logistic regression. Results PPCs occurred in 43 patients (37.4%). The LAS VEGAS score demonstrated the best discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.648, p = .005), followed by ARISCAT (AUC = 0.598, p = .067) and ASA (AUC = 0.562, p = .123). Independent predictors of PPCs were preoperative hemoglobin (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62–0.95) and intraoperative noradrenaline use (OR 5.93, 95% CI 2.36–15.95). A combined model including these two variables achieved an AUC of 0.772, which was significantly superior to the individual scores. Conclusions The ARISCAT, ASA, and LAS VEGAS scores showed only weak-to-moderate predictive performance for PPCs after thoracic surgery with OLV. These findings do not support their routine use in this setting and highlight the need for thoracic surgery-specific risk prediction tools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giovanella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: