Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 12, 2026European Heart Journal OpenOpen Access

Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Cardiogenic Shock on Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JEJan EstoppeyIMIulia Maia MuresanMBMatthias Bossard

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Randomized trial demonstrates higher 6-month mortality with right ventricular dysfunction during Impella support for cardiogenic shock, highlighting the need for tailored device selection.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction and determine its association with 6-month mortality and hemodynamic stabilization in cardiogenic shock patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support.
  • Interventional study analyzing 745 patients with cardiogenic shock from the SWISS Circulatory Support Registry (NCT04117230).
  • Compared outcomes between patients supported with left-side Impella devices (N=580, including 39 requiring a concomitant second device) and VA-ECMO (N=165).
  • Defined right ventricular dysfunction by TAPSE < 14 mm, TAPSE/sPAP < 0.34, RAP > 15 mmHg, RAP/PCWP > 0.63, or PAPi < 1.85, evaluating 6-month mortality and hemodynamic markers.
  • Right ventricular dysfunction occurred in 60% of patients on VA-ECMO compared to 33% of those supported with Impella (p < 0.001).
  • In Impella-treated patients, right ventricular dysfunction was associated with significantly higher 6-month mortality (43% vs. 30%, p = 0.015), higher lactate (1.6 vs. 1.3 mmol/L, p = 0.01), lower central venous oxygen saturation (55% vs. 61%, p = 0.005), and reduced mean arterial pressure (55 vs. 58 mmHg, p = 0.002).
  • In VA-ECMO patients, 6-month mortality was numerically higher with right ventricular dysfunction but did not achieve statistical significance (61% vs. 45%, p = 0.13).

Cite This Study

Estoppey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa51f39327956e4761f96d3https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeag139
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share