Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cross-sectional study reveals low palliative treatment rates in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, highlighting gaps in symptom-focused care for advanced cancer.
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a chronic, generally incurable group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas associated with substantial symptom burden, yet receipt of palliative-intent treatment in this population remains uncharacterized. We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 13,215 patients with CTCL using the National Cancer Database (2004–2023) to evaluate receipt of palliative-intent treatment by sociodemographic and disease characteristics using χ2 tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Fisher’s exact tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Only 355 patients (2.7%) received palliative-intent treatment. In multivariable analysis, the strongest factors associated with palliative-intent treatment receipt were regional stage (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.43–4.17) and distant stage (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.86–3.31). Treatment at academic facilities was associated with significantly lower odds of NCDB-defined palliative care receipt (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.76). Medicare insurance, primary cutaneous CD30+ histology, higher comorbidity burden, head and neck primary site, and more recent diagnosis were also independently associated with receipt of palliative-intent treatment. Sex, race, income, and distance to the facility were not significant. Palliative-intent treatment receipt is markedly low in CTCL despite guideline recommendations supporting early integration. Systematic screening for palliative care needs is warranted, particularly for patients with advanced-stage disease or high symptom burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: