Key result
Follow-up MI or PCI linked to ~67% higher major bleeding risk during DAPT.
Why the study?
Bleeding is a concern after PCI and subsequent DAPT, motivating an evaluation of the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding.
What are the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding among patients undergoing PCI and receiving dual antiplatelet therapy?
Cohort (n=9,013)
Double-blind
Randomized to drug-eluting stent or bare-metal stent (analyzed as a single cohort)
Yes
What are the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding among patients undergoing PCI and receiving dual antiplatelet therapy?
In a large pragmatic trial cohort, the 12-month incidence of major bleeding after PCI and DAPT was 2.3%, highlighting chronic kidney disease, advanced age, low bodyweight, and diabetes as key risk factors.
May warrant closer monitoring after recurrent events on DAPT; leaves open whether risk-adapted strategies reduce bleeding.
INTRODUCTION: Bleeding is a concern after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We herein report the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding in the Norwegian Coronary Stent Trial (NORSTENT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: NORSTENT was a randomized, double blind, pragmatic trial among patients with acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary disease undergoing PCI during 2008-11. The patients (N = 9,013) were randomized to receive either a drug-eluting stent or a bare-metal stent, and were treated with at least nine months of DAPT. The patients were followed for a median of five years, with Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 major bleeding as one of the safety endpoints. We estimated cumulative incidence of major bleeding by a competing risks model and risk factors through cause-specific Cox models. RESULTS: The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 2.3%. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were chronic kidney disease, low bodyweight (< 60 kilograms), diabetes mellitus, and advanced age (> 80 years). A myocardial infarction (MI) or PCI during follow-up increased the risk of major bleeding (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1-29-2.15). CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month cumulative incidence of major bleeding in NORSTENT was higher than reported in previous, explanatory trials. This analysis strengthens the role of chronic kidney disease, advanced age, and low bodyweight as risk factors for major bleeding among patients receiving DAPT after PCI. The presence of diabetes mellitus or recurrent MI among patients is furthermore a signal of increased bleeding risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Unique identifier NCT00811772; http://www.clinicaltrial.gov.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuelsen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome or stable coronary disease (n=9,013). Myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention during follow-up vs. No myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention during follow-up was evaluated on Major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3-5) (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.29-2.15). A myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention during follow-up increased the risk of major bleeding by 67% (HR 1.67) among patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: