Key result
Heart rate cost drops at five days versus 24 hours post-training, effectively distinguishing recovery status.
Why the study?
Effective recovery monitoring is crucial to optimize performance and prevent overreaching, injuries, and overtraining, motivating the evaluation of heart rate cost during submaximal running as a simple tool to assess recovery after high-intensity training.
Does heart rate cost (HRC) effectively monitor recovery status after high-intensity training in male recreational runners?
Does heart rate cost (HRC) effectively monitor recovery status after high-intensity training in male recreational runners?
Heart rate cost during submaximal running is a simple, effective tool for monitoring acute recovery status after high-intensity training.
HRC may distinguish recovery status in male recreational runners; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Purpose Effective recovery monitoring is crucial to optimise performance and prevent overreaching, injuries, and overtraining. This study evaluated the heart rate cost (HRC) during submaximal running as a simple, non-invasive, and costeffective tool to assess recovery after a high-intensity training session. Methods Fifteen male recreational runners (aged 18–31 years) participated in this investigation. Assessments included anamnesis, blood tests (CPK, cortisol, testosterone), body composition analysis, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), pain scale, vertical jump (VJ), and a 6-minute submaximal running test to determine HRC (HR/running velocity). Afterwards, participants completed a high-intensity training session, consisting of six 1-minute treadmill runs and 10 strength exercises in a circuit format. Results HRC increased 24 h post-training, indicating higher physiological cost, but significantly decreased after five days of recovery (p = 0.044). VJ performance returned to normal after five days compared to 24 h post-training (p = 0.013), with a significant correlation between the delta reduction in HRC and performance recovery on VJ (r = –0.689). No significant changes were found in the testosterone/cortisol ratio or HRV (HRV) (p > 0.05), likely due to the fact that these variables reflect chronic stress more than acute stress. CPK levels mirrored HRC and VJ trends, worsening 24 h post-training and improving after five days (p = 0.01). Conclusions HRC proved effective in distinguishing recovery status after high-intensity training, showing sensitivity comparable to VJ and CPK measurements. These findings are relevant for researchers, coaches, and athletes in daily recovery assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filho et al. (2024) studied Healthy recreational runners (n=15). High-intensity training session vs. Baseline and 5 days of recovery was evaluated on Heart rate cost (HRC) during submaximal running (p=0.044). Heart rate cost significantly decreased after five days of recovery compared to 24 hours post-training (p = 0.044), demonstrating its effectiveness in distinguishing recovery status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: