Key result
Progressively increased training intensity or volume improved maximal treadmill speed to a similar extent in recreational endurance athletes.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to examine the effects of progressively increased training intensity or volume on nocturnal HR, HRV, countermovement jump, perceived recovery, and HR-RS index, and how these monitoring patterns associate with endurance performance changes.
Does progressively increased training intensity or volume improve endurance performance and affect recovery markers in recreational endurance athletes?
Does progressively increased training intensity or volume improve endurance performance and affect recovery markers in recreational endurance athletes?
Increased training intensity or volume improves endurance performance to a similar extent, and long-term monitoring of the HR-RS index may help predict positive adaptations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support progressive training increases for performance gains in recreational athletes; leaves open recovery marker utility and optimal strategies.
The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of progressively increased training intensity or volume on the nocturnal heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV), countermovement jump, perceived recovery, and heart rate-running speed index (HR-RS index). Another aim was to analyze how observed patterns during the training period in these monitoring variables were associated with the changes in endurance performance. Thirty recreationally trained participants performed a 10-week control period of regular training and a 10-week training period of either increased training intensity (INT, n = 13) or volume (VOL, n = 17). Changes in endurance performance were assessed by an incremental treadmill test. Both groups improved their maximal speed on the treadmill (INT 3.4 ± 3.2%, p < 0.001; VOL 2.1 ± 1.8%, p = 0.006). In the monitoring variables, only between-group difference (p = 0.013) was found in nocturnal HR, which decreased in INT (p = 0.016). In addition, perceived recovery decreased in VOL (p = 0.021) and tended to decrease in INT (p = 0.056). When all participants were divided into low-responders and responders in maximal running performance, the increase in the HR-RS index at the end of the training period was greater in responders (p = 0.005). In conclusion, current training periods of increased intensity or volume improved endurance performance to a similar extent. Countermovement jump and HRV remained unaffected, despite a slight decrease in perceived recovery. Long-term monitoring of the HR-RS index may help to predict positive adaptations, while interpretation of other recovery-related markers may need a more individualized approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuuttila et al. (2021) studied Recreational endurance athletes (n=30). Increased training intensity vs. Increased training volume was evaluated on Maximal speed on the treadmill. Progressively increased training intensity or volume improved maximal treadmill speed to a similar extent in recreational endurance athletes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: