Key result
Transvenous full pacemaker implantation is linked to abnormal troponin-I in ~80% of patients versus generator-only procedures.
Why the study?
Does transvenous permanent pacemaker lead implantation cause clinically detectable myocardial damage in patients requiring antibradycardia pacing?
Cohort (n=40)
Does transvenous permanent pacemaker lead implantation cause clinically detectable myocardial damage in patients requiring antibradycardia pacing?
Transvenous insertion of endocardial leads for permanent pacing causes minimal, early-peaking myocardial damage as evidenced by cardiac troponin-I elevation.
Troponin elevation after transvenous lead placement warrants biomarker caution; leaves open clinical relevance and need for outcome studies.
OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that transvenous permanent pacemaker lead implantation causes clinically detectable myocardial damage. BACKGROUND: Histological evidence of myocardial damage has been reported after antibradycardia pacemaker lead implantation. METHODS: We studied 30 patients undergoing implantation of a full antibradycardia pacemaker system (pulse generator plus leads) and 10 patients in whom only a generator was implanted. Blood samples for cardiac troponin-I (CTNI), CK-MB mass, and myoglobin measurement were drawn at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours thereafter. RESULTS: Abnormal CTNI levels were noted only in 24 of the 30 patients undergoing a full system implantation. CTNI levels were already abnormal at the end of the procedure in 16 and became so in all 24 during the next 6 hours. Peak levels were reached within 6 hours in 21 patients and were compatible with "minimal" necrosis (CTNI < 1.5 pg/mL) in 20. Maximum ventricular lead diameter and number of implanted leads were independent predictors of peak CTNI levels. CK-MB mass also increased after the procedure, but exceeded the normal range in only 10 patients. Myoglobin levels increased significantly both in patients undergoing a complete system implantation and in those where only a pulse generator was implanted. CONCLUSIONS: Transvenous insertion of endocardial leads for permanent pacing is accompanied in most patients by "minimal" myocardial damage. In this setting CTNI level kinetics are fast, characterized by early elevation and peak.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Νικολάου et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Antibradycardia pacemaker implantation (n=40). Implantation of a full antibradycardia pacemaker system (pulse generator plus leads) vs. Implantation of only a pulse generator was evaluated on Abnormal cardiac troponin-I (CTNI) levels. Transvenous implantation of a full pacemaker system caused abnormal cardiac troponin-I levels in 80% (24 of 30) of patients, compared to 0% (0 of 10) with generator implantation only.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: