Key result
Internal Family Systems psychotherapy improves joint pain and physical function vs education in RA patients.
Why the study?
Does an Internal Family Systems psychotherapeutic intervention improve disease activity and psychological status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
RCT (n=79)
Single-blind (rheumatologists blinded to group assignment)
Computer algorithm with a fixed 1:1 allocation ratio
No
Does an Internal Family Systems psychotherapeutic intervention improve disease activity and psychological status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
Mean Difference: -0.9 (95% CI -1.6–-0.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.5% vs 2.1%
p-value: p=0.01
An Internal Family Systems-based psychotherapeutic intervention is feasible and improves pain, physical function, and depressive symptoms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, though it does not significantly improve objective disease activity.
Supports integrating Internal Family Systems psychotherapy into rheumatoid arthritis care; extends evidence for psychosocial interventions in inflammatory arthritis.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a proof-of-concept randomized trial of an Internal Family Systems (IFS) psychotherapeutic intervention on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity and psychological status. METHODS: Patients with RA were randomized to either an IFS group for 9 months (n = 39) or an education (control) group (n = 40) that received mailed materials on RA symptoms and management. The groups were evaluated every 3 months until intervention end and 1 year later. Self-assessed joint pain (RA Disease Activity Index joint score), Short Form-12 physical function score, visual analog scale for overall pain and mental health status (Beck Depression Inventory, and State Trait Anxiety Inventory) were assessed. The 28-joint Disease Activity Score-C-reactive Protein 4 was determined by rheumatologists blinded to group assignment. Treatment effects were estimated by between-group differences, and mixed model repeated measures compared trends between study arms at 9 months and 1 year after intervention end. RESULTS: Of 79 participants randomized, 68 completed the study assessments and 82% of the IFS group completed the protocol. Posttreatment improvements favoring the IFS group occurred in overall pain [mean treatment effects -14.9 (29.1 SD); p = 0.04], and physical function [14.6 (25.3); p = 0.04]. Posttreatment improvements were sustained 1 year later in self-assessed joint pain [-0.6 (1.1); p = 0.04], self-compassion [1.8 (2.8); p = 0.01], and depressive symptoms [-3.2 (5.0); p =0.01]. There were no sustained improvements in anxiety, self-efficacy, or disease activity. CONCLUSION: An IFS-based intervention is feasible and acceptable to patients with RA and may complement medical management of the disease. Future efficacy trials are warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00869349.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shadick et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Rheumatoid Arthritis (n=79). Internal Family Systems (IFS) psychotherapeutic intervention vs. Education (control) group receiving mailed materials was evaluated on Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) joint score at 9 months (MD -0.9, 95% CI -1.6 to -0.2, p=0.01). An Internal Family Systems-based psychotherapeutic intervention significantly improved self-assessed joint pain (MD -0.9, p=0.01) and physical function compared to an education control group in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: