Key result
Women with HFpEF and INOCA show a graded reduction in MPRI versus reference controls.
Why the study?
Women with INOCA face an increased risk of MACE, including HFpEF, prompting an investigation into shared pathophysiological links.
Is myocardial perfusion reserve index reduced in women with INOCA and HFpEF compared to reference controls?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Is myocardial perfusion reserve index reduced in women with INOCA and HFpEF compared to reference controls?
p-value: p=0.02
Reduced myocardial perfusion reserve appears to be a shared pathophysiologic feature in women with INOCA and HFpEF.
Reduced perfusion reserve may link INOCA and HFpEF in women; leaves open causal role and therapeutic targeting.
Aim: Women with evidence of ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) have an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events, including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To investigate potential links between INOCA and HFpEF, we examined pathophysiological findings present in both INOCA and HFpEF. Methods: We performed adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) in 56 participants, including 35 women with suspected INOCA, 13 women with HFpEF, and 8 reference control women. Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed at rest and with vasodilator stress with intravenous adenosine. Myocardial perfusion reserve index was quantified as the ratio of the upslope of increase in myocardial contrast at stress vs. rest. All CMRI measures were quantified using CVI42 software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc). Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression models, Fisher’s exact tests, ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: Age (P = 0.007), Body surface area (0.05) were higher in the HFpEF group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (P = 0.02) was lower among the INOCA and HFpEF groups than reference controls after age adjustment. In addition, there was a graded reduction in myocardial perfusion reserve index in HFpEF vs. INOCA vs. reference controls (1.5 ± 0.3, 1.8 ± 0.3, 1.9 ± 0.3, P = 0.02), which was attenuated with age-adjustment. Conclusion: Reduced myocardial perfusion reserve appears to be a common pathophysiologic feature in INOCA and HFpEF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldiwani et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=56). INOCA and HFpEF vs. Reference controls was evaluated on Myocardial perfusion reserve index (p=0.02). Women with HFpEF and INOCA demonstrated a graded reduction in myocardial perfusion reserve index compared to reference controls (1.5 vs 1.8 vs 1.9; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: