Why the study?
Does the use of an inferior vena cava filter prevent pulmonary embolism in perioperative patients with deep venous thrombosis?
Does the use of an inferior vena cava filter prevent pulmonary embolism in perioperative patients with deep venous thrombosis?
Inferior vena cava filters should be restricted to perioperative patients at very high risk of pulmonary embolism who have prolonged contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis due to high bleeding risk.
Restrict IVC filters to highest-risk perioperative cases with bleeding contraindications; reinforces evidence-based limits on routine use.
: The indications for the use of an inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) in the context of deep venous thrombosis to prevent pulmonary embolism remain controversial. Despite wide use in clinical practice, great variation exists in national and international guidelines in regard to the indications. In addition, clinical practice is based on poor-quality data from trauma and bariatric surgery with a high incidence of complications. It is often difficult to assess their efficacy and lack of filter retrieval appears to be a substantial issue compared with a potential benefit by insertion of these devices. Complications usually refer to increased risk of deep venous thrombosis, filter perforation, filter penetration, filter migration, inferior vena cava occlusion and subsequently failure in pulmonary embolism prevention. Evidence from low-quality studies or registries, with small numbers of patients and conflicting findings, does not allow for a strong recommendation for or against the use of IVCFs. IVCFs should only be considered in cases of very high risk of pulmonary embolism and in perioperative situations at very high risk of bleeding, resulting in a prolonged contra-indication to pharmacological prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrandis et al. (2017) conducted a review in Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism prevention. Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) was evaluated. Inferior vena cava filters should only be considered in cases of very high risk of pulmonary embolism and in perioperative situations at very high risk of bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: