Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of fluorinated metal–organic frameworks (F-MOFs) have been successfully synthesized under hydrothermal condition using 4,4′-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) bis(benzoic acid) (C17H10F6O4, H2hfbba) as a flexible dicarboxylate building block, Cu+2 and various heterocyclic co-ligands. These F-MOFs formulated as [Cu(hfbba)(phen)2]·2(H2hfbba)(H2O)(HCO2) (F-MOF-1), [Cu(hfbba)2(2,2′-bipy)2(H2O)] (F-MOF-2), [Cu(hfbba)(4,4′dime-2,2′-bipy)(HCO2)]·(hfbba)(H2O) (F-MOF-3), [Cu2(hfbba)2(3-mepy)2]·(DMF)2(3-mepy) (F-MOF-4), and [Cu(hfbba)2(phen)2]·0.5(DMF) (F-MOF-5) (hfbba = 4,4′-(Hexafluoroisopropylidene) bis(benzoate), phen = 1,10-phenanthroline; 2,2′-bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine; 4,4′dime-2,2′-bipy = 4,4′dimethyl 2,2′-bipyridine; 3-mepy = 3-methyl-pyridine and DMF = dimethyl formamide) display interesting H-bonded, 1D and 2D structural features. All these F-MOFs were structurally determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. F-MOF-1 and 5 form a distorted octahedral Cu+2 secondary building unit (SBU). F-MOF-5 forms a one-dimensional architecture constructed from Cu2+ ions bridged by phen anions and two types of 4 hfbba ligands while in F-MOF-1, two among the three acid co-ligands are not coordinated with Cu2+ ions. F-MOF-2 displays dinuclear SBUs within the three-dimensional frameworks whereas F-MOF-3 displays mononuclear SBUs and forms a one-dimensional chain. F-MOF-4 display a interesting 2D framework with conventional Cu2(CO2)4 paddle wheel SBU. In the crystal structures four hfbba ligands, each coordinated to a dicopper paddlewheel unit via one of their carboxylate groups. Solid-state properties such as UV-vis and thermal stability of F-MOF-1–5 have also been studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pachfule et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: