Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
This research is Trending!
September 12, 2026JACC AdvancesOpen Access

Hospital Financial Structure and Unplanned Rehospitalization Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

For-profit hospital status is linked to ~15% greater odds of 30-day nonelective readmission after AMI.

  • AOR 1.15
  • n=4,636,970

Why the study?

Although for-profit hospitals have shown higher readmission rates than not-for-profit counterparts, ownership-related trends in readmissions and outcomes following AMI remain poorly characterized.

Does treatment at for-profit hospitals increase 30-day nonelective readmission rates in adults with acute myocardial infarction?

Population

4,636,970 adult nonelective AMI hospitalizations from the 2013 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database

Comparison

For-profit hospitals vs not-for-profit hospitals

Design

Retrospective observational study using Nationwide Readmissions Database

Follow-up

30 days

Authors

PLPreston LeungUniversity of California, Los AngelesJRJaden RahmaniUniversity of California, Los AngelesOLOwen LaiUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May warrant quality monitoring at for-profit hospitals; leaves open whether ownership causally drives readmissions or reflects unmeasured factors.

JACC Advances · cohort study. After AMI, for-profit hospitals linked to more 30-day readmissions. Hospital Financial Structure and Unplanned Rehospitalization Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States Although for-profit hospitals have shown higher readmission rates than not-for-profit counterparts, ownership-related trends in readmissions and outcomes following AMI remain poorly characterized. Does treatment at for-profit hospitals increase 30-day nonelective readmission rates in adults with acute myocardial infarction? 4636970 participants, Retrospective observational study using…. 30-day nonelective readmission: OR 1.15. For-profit hospital status was independently associated with greater odds of 30-day nonelective readmission (adjusted OR 1.15) following acute myocardial infarction. Read the evidence. See where experts stand. synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa55530327956e4761fa08b

0:00 / 0:29

Key Points

  • Assess temporal trends in 30-day nonelective readmissions and post-readmission clinical outcomes among acute myocardial infarction patients stratified by hospital ownership between 2013 and 2022.
  • Extracted nonelective acute myocardial infarction admissions (N=4,636,970) from the 2013–2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database, stratifying by for-profit versus not-for-profit hospital ownership.
  • Analyzed longitudinal readmission trends using the Cuzick nonparametric test and evaluated readmission outcomes using doubly robust methodology.
  • Unplanned 30-day readmission rates significantly declined at not-for-profit hospitals from 11.5% to 10.5% (P < 0.001) but remained stable at for-profit hospitals from 13.0% to 12.7% (P = 0.09).
  • For-profit hospital status was independently associated with increased odds of 30-day nonelective readmission (AOR 1.15), respiratory complications (AOR 1.11), renal complications (AOR 1.04), and nonhome discharge (AOR 1.07).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=4,636,970)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does treatment at for-profit hospitals increase 30-day nonelective readmission rates in adults with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
4,636,970 adult nonelective acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations in the United States from 2013 to 2022, assessed for 30-day unplanned readmission.
E
Exposure
Treatment at for-profit hospitals
C
Comparator
Treatment at not-for-profit hospitals
O
Outcome
30-day nonelective readmission rateshard clinical

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 1.15

Treatment at for-profit hospitals for acute myocardial infarction is associated with higher 30-day unplanned readmission rates and increased complications compared to not-for-profit hospitals.

Cite This Study

Leung et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction (n=4,636,970). For-profit hospital status vs. Not-for-profit hospitals was evaluated on 30-day nonelective readmission (AOR 1.15). For-profit hospital status was independently associated with greater odds of 30-day nonelective readmission (adjusted OR 1.15) following acute myocardial infarction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa55530327956e4761fa08bhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103218
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coronary artery bypass graft readmission rates and risk factors - A retrospective cohort study2018 · 69 citations
  2. 2Clinical Interventions to Reduce Preventable Hospital Readmission After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention2016 · 52 citations
  3. 3A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk1999 · 13,935 citations
  4. 4Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation2018 · 24 citations
  5. 5Association of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, and Pneumonia2018 · 350 citations