Key result
High home SBP variability links to ~117% higher net cardiovascular risk in elderly NVAF patients.
Why the study?
Although AF is frequently accompanied by hypertension, the relationship between mid-term home blood pressure variability and prognosis in patients with AF remains unclear.
Does higher mid-term home blood pressure variability increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=4,885)
Does higher mid-term home blood pressure variability increase the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 2.17 (95% CI 1.28–3.69)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.27% vs 1.1%
p-value: p=0.004
In elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, greater mid-term home blood pressure variability is independently associated with a twofold increased risk of adverse cardiovascular and bleeding events, beyond average blood pressure.
May warrant closer home BP variability monitoring in elderly non-valvular AF; leaves open whether targeting variability improves outcomes.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently accompanied by hypertension; however, the relationship between mid-term blood pressure variability (BPV) assessed using home blood pressure (BP) measurements and prognosis in patients with AF remains unclear. We examined the association between home BPV and cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients with non-valvular AF using data from the ANAFIE (All Nippon AF In the Elderly) Registry. This post hoc analysis of a prospective registry included 4885 patients aged ≥75 years who performed standardized home BP measurements in the morning and evening (two measurements at each time point) over seven consecutive days. Mid-term BPV was quantified using the coefficient of variation of systolic home BP and categorized into quartiles. The primary endpoint was a net cardiovascular outcome, defined as a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, and major bleeding. Associations were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for mean BP and established risk factors. Over a median follow-up of two years, the net cardiovascular outcome occurred in 171 patients. Compared with the lowest BPV quartile, patients in the highest quartile had a significantly higher risk of the net cardiovascular outcome (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.21–3.40). Higher risks were also observed for stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial hemorrhage, and bleeding. Findings were consistent when BPV was assessed using the standard deviation and across subgroups. In conclusion, greater mid-term home BPV was independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk beyond average BP in elderly patients with non-valvular AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=4,885). High home systolic blood pressure variability (highest quartile of standard deviation) vs. Low home systolic blood pressure variability (lowest quartile of standard deviation) was evaluated on Net cardiovascular outcome (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.28-3.69, p=0.004). High home systolic blood pressure variability was associated with a significantly increased risk of net cardiovascular outcomes compared to low variability in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (HR 2.17).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: