Key result
Whole-exome sequencing identifies 21 pathogenic variants in CAD patients including several novel mutations.
Why the study?
CAD etiology involves complex genetic and environmental interplay, and identifying impactful genetic variants may help explain the risk, severity, and clinical outcomes of the condition.
Does whole-exome sequencing identify novel and known pathogenic genetic variants in patients with coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=28)
No
Does whole-exome sequencing identify novel and known pathogenic genetic variants in patients with coronary artery disease?
Whole-exome sequencing in CAD patients identified novel likely pathogenic variants in genes related to cardiac structure and function, highlighting the role of rare genetic modifiers in cardiovascular disease.
Supports expanded variant catalogs in CAD; leaves open clinical utility and causal roles pending prospective validation.
Background The etiology of CAD is multifactorial, involving a complex interplay of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, and CAD markedly increases the likelihood of impaired quality of life. Aim To identify potentially impactful genetic variants in patients with CAD that may influence the risk, severity, and clinical outcomes of the condition, we performed whole exome sequencing (WES) in 28 patients. Diverse risk factors such as gender and clinical conditions, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and T2DM, which are known contributors to cardiovascular adversities, have been found to be present in a significant proportion of the patients. Results Our study identified 13,289 variants in 108 genes across the cohort, with a median of 545 per patient. The most frequently mutated genes were TTN, followed by GAA, SVIL, NRAP, and DMD, all of which are related to sarcomere structural and functional integrity and cardiomyopathies. Analysis of VEP impact identified 341 variants in 58 genes with 122 novel variants (36%) not previously reported in public databases. The variants were classified as missense (66%), followed by frameshifts (25%) and in-frame indels (5%), with a minor proportion (4%) of nonsense, splice-site, and other protein-altering variants. Among these 58 genes, TTN emerged as the most frequently mutated gene, present in 96% of patient samples, while the other substantially mutated genes in patients included FLNC (29%), AGL (25%), ALPK3 (21%), and DSP (21%). A comprehensive analysis of candidate variants identified 21 variants classified as either pathogenic (3) or likely pathogenic (18), which may play a significant role in the development of cardiovascular disease. These variants met the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria for PM2 classification, indicating a very low (<1%) or absent frequency in population databases. Among these, eight variants were novel and classified as likely pathogenic, reported in genes GAA, MYH6, NEXN, ATA3A, RHBDF1, and ACTA1. Most gene variants have functional significance in cardiovascular pathologies, as demonstrated by gene ontology and human phenotype ontology enrichment analyses reported in this study. Conclusion The study has utilized whole exome sequencing to identify both known and novel gene variants that may contribute to disease risk, facilitating a deeper understanding of the genetic landscape of CAD. This high-resolution approach allows the detection of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in critical genes associated with cardiovascular health and provides evidence of functional significance, thereby elucidating complex interactions between genetic factors and enhancing understanding of disease mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mir et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=28). Genetic variants was evaluated on Identification of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants. Whole-exome sequencing identified 21 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in CAD patients, including 8 novel variants in GAA, MYH6, NEXN, ATAD3A, RHBDF1, and ACTA1 genes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: