OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether there was a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) and/or physical frailty (PF) in persons with diabetes compared to their non-diabetic counterparts, and the individual and combined impact of CI and PF on functional and mortality outcomes among diabetic older persons. METHOD: Community-living diabetic and non-diabetic participants (N = 2696) aged 55 and above were assessed on CI (MMSE) and PF (CHS criteria) status. Among 486 diabetic persons, we estimated the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals (OR, 95% CI) of association of CI and/or PF with prevalent IADL and ADL disability and mortality from 11 years of follow up. RESULTS: Diabetes was associated with significantly higher prevalence of CI and/or PF. Adjusted for sex, age, education, smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and BMI, diabetes was associated with higher prevalence of PF alone (OR = 2.24, 1.16-4.34) and PF with CI (OR = 2.01, 1.12-3.60), but not with CI alone (OR = 1.02, 0.73-1.44). In multivariable analyses of 486 diabetic older adults, compared to non-frail (NF) and cognitive normal (CN), CI alone was not significantly associated with IADL (OR = 1.06, 0.53-2.10), but PF alone was associated with considerably higher prevalence of IADL (OR = 6.72, 1.84-24.5). PF with CI was associated with the highest prevalence of IADL (OR = 17.8, 3.66-8.68) and ADL disability (OR = 93.8, 23.6-372.4). Whether singly or in combination, PF and/or CI were associated with worse hazard (HR) ratio for mortality outcomes: CI alone (HR = 2.72, 1.48-5.01), PF alone (HR = 4.30, 1.88-9.82) and CI with PF (HR = 8.41, 3.95-17.9). CONCLUSION: Cognitive impairment and/or physical frailty are powerful prognostic factors identifying people with diabetes at high risk of mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thein et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: