Key result
Radiofrequency ultrasound signals differentiate calcific, fibrotic, and normal in vitro mitral valves.
Why the study?
Does online evaluation of radiofrequency ultrasound signal differentiate between calcific, fibrotic, and normal mitral valves in vitro?
Does online evaluation of radiofrequency ultrasound signal differentiate between calcific, fibrotic, and normal mitral valves in vitro?
p-value: p=<0.005
Online evaluation of radiofrequency ultrasonic signals can successfully differentiate between calcific, fibrotic, and normal mitral valves in vitro.
Ultrasonic differentiation of mitral valve tissue in vitro; hypothesis-generating for clinical use pending in vivo validation.
Sixty five mitral valves were studied in vitro with a 2.25 MHz transducer. Radiofrequency signals were analysed by a microprocessor system (implemented on an M-mode commercially available echocardiography) for online evaluation of ultrasonic backscatter (8 bits of amplitude resolution, 40 MHz sampling rate, 1 microsecond acquisition gate). The integrated value of the rectified signal amplitude was expressed as the integrated backscatter index (in db). The highest value recorded with ultrasonic scanning of each sample was taken as representative of that specimen. Calcification of mitral valves was assessed by radiography (24 mitral valves). Non-calcified mitral calves underwent pathological examination, and fibrotic valves (22 mitral valves) were differentiated from normal valves (19 mitral valves). A statistically significant (p less than 0.005) difference was recorded among the three groups for the index maximal value: calcific -7.4(3.1) db (mean(SD)), fibrotic -18.9(4.9) db, and normal -37.9(7.6) db. In conclusion, a microprocessor based system for online evaluation of radiofrequency ultrasonic signals, which may also be feasible for in vivo studies, provided a clear differentiation in vitro of calcific, fibrotic, and normal mitral valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lattanzi et al. (1987) studied Mitral valve disease (n=65). Online evaluation of radiofrequency ultrasound signal vs. Normal mitral valves was evaluated on Integrated backscatter index maximal value (p=<0.005). Online evaluation of radiofrequency ultrasonic signals differentiated in vitro mitral valves: calcific (-7.4 dB), fibrotic (-18.9 dB), and normal (-37.9 dB) (p<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: