Key result
High social evaluative threat is linked to greater SBP reactivity in Type D participants.
Why the study?
Does high social evaluative threat increase cardiovascular and cortisol stress reactions in individuals with Type D personality compared to nonsocial stress?
Does high social evaluative threat increase cardiovascular and cortisol stress reactions in individuals with Type D personality compared to nonsocial stress?
Type D individuals exhibit exaggerated cardiovascular and cortisol stress responses specifically under conditions of high social evaluative threat, highlighting a potential mechanism for increased cardiovascular disease risk.
May heighten CV risk assessment in Type D under social threat; hypothesis-generating for mechanisms, needs prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Social evaluative threat is an important factor in the cardiovascular response to mental stress. This study examined whether Type D personality, characterized by social inhibition and negative affectivity, is associated with an adverse cardiovascular response to a non-social and social evaluative threat. METHODS: A total of 2300 students were screened for Type D personality, and 130 were selected for a nonsocial stress exposure condition (31 Type D, 30 non-Type D: 52% female) or a condition high in social evaluative threat (35 Type D, 34 non-Type D: 55% female). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), and salivary cortisol were measured. RESULTS: Social evaluative threat resulted in higher cardiovascular responses than the nonsocial challenge (SBP, p = .001, η = 0.092;DBP, p = .006, η = 0.058;HR, p = .006, η = 0.059). The greatest cardiovascular stress reactions were exhibited by Type D participants in the high social evaluation condition; reflected in significant group by condition interactions for SBP (F(1,126) = 7.29, p = .008, η = 0.055), DBP (F(1,126) = 5.23, p = .024, η = 0.040), and HR (F(1,126) = 5.04, p = .027, η = 0.038) reactivity. Only Type Ds in the social condition mounted a positive cortisol response (F(1,33) = 5.07, p = .031, η = 0.133). CONCLUSIONS: Type D individuals show different stress reactions depending on the social evaluative nature of the stress exposure. These findings suggest that dysregulation of the stress response in social situations potentially increases cardiovascular disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bibbey et al. (2015) studied Psychological stress (n=130). High social evaluative threat vs. Nonsocial stress exposure was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) reactivity (group by condition interaction) (p=0.008). Type D participants exposed to high social evaluative threat exhibited the greatest cardiovascular stress reactions, including significantly higher systolic blood pressure reactivity (P=0.008).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: