Key result
A hybrid time- and frequency-domain analysis of photoplethysmographic signals accurately estimated heart rate compared to standard ECG, with a mean absolute error of 1.51 BPM.
Why the study?
Does a hybrid time- and frequency-domain analysis of photoplethysmographic signals accurately measure heart rate compared to standard ECG at rest?
Does a hybrid time- and frequency-domain analysis of photoplethysmographic signals accurately measure heart rate compared to standard ECG at rest?
A hybrid time- and frequency-domain analysis of photoplethysmographic signals provides accurate heart rate monitoring at rest compared to standard ECG, demonstrating potential for use in wearable devices.
May support wearable HR monitoring at rest; leaves open prospective validation in ambulatory settings.
Heart rate (HR) is one of the vital signs in healthcare monitoring systems. The traditional medical devices are very expensive and the accessibility of these devices is limited. So the objective is to propose an efficient framework to monitor the HR at on‐demand and continuous modes during rest conditions, which are a typical use case. The proposed framework is based on combining the time‐domain (TD) and frequency‐domain (FD) analysis. This hybrid approach would handle the different signal conditions to improve the results. The proposed method is compared with the standard ECG device and the real‐time results show that the HR is calculated accurately with an average pass percentage of 97.85, mean absolute percentage error of 1.99%, mean absolute error of 1.51 BPM and reference closeness factor of 0.977. The reliable on‐demand HR output from the proposed method comes in 6th second, which is the minimum possible time. The results show that the proposed method is efficient in estimating the HR and the results are comparable with other methods. So the proposed method can be targeted to wearable devices to accurately monitor the HR at rest conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madhan Mohan P. (2017) studied Heart rate monitoring at rest conditions. Hybrid time-domain and frequency-domain analysis of photoplethysmographic signals vs. Standard ECG device was evaluated on Heart rate calculation accuracy. A hybrid time- and frequency-domain analysis of photoplethysmographic signals accurately estimated heart rate compared to standard ECG, with a mean absolute error of 1.51 BPM.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: