Key result
New waveform-triggered laser Doppler probe strongly correlates with microspheres for measuring RMBF in a porcine model.
Why the study?
Does an LVP-triggered near-infrared laser Doppler device accurately measure regional myocardial blood flow compared to fluorescent microspheres in a porcine model?
Does an LVP-triggered near-infrared laser Doppler device accurately measure regional myocardial blood flow compared to fluorescent microspheres in a porcine model?
A novel LVP-triggered near-infrared laser Doppler device provides accurate, continuous measurement of regional myocardial blood flow at different depths in a beating heart porcine model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preclinical validation of LVP-triggered laser Doppler for myocardial blood flow; human translation remains untested.
Please cite this paper as: Bierbach B, Scheewe J, Derfuss T, Krug A, Schramm R, Dahm M, Kuroczynski W, Kempski O, Horstick G. Continuous regional myocardial blood flow measurement: validation of a near‐infrared laser Doppler device in a porcine model. Microcirculation 19: 485–493, 2012. Abstract Objective: RMBF measurement is a major concern in various clinical and experimental settings, but no validated device for RMBF is currently available. Methods: An LVP‐triggered laser Doppler to measure RMBF was validated by simultaneous fluorescent MS RMBF in a porcine LAD flow reduction model (n = 10 pigs). The laser probe was positioned on the left ventricle’s anterior wall. LAD blood flow reduction was achieved by a shaft‐driven occluder positioned proximal to the transit‐time flow meter measuring coronary blood flow. RMBF was measured at baseline; after the reduction of LAD blood flow to 70% and 30% of baseline; at 20 and 120 minutes of reperfusion; and, finally, 15 minutes after LAD occlusion. Results: Laser Doppler RMBF (LDU) correlated strongly with MS RMBF under all tested conditions: baseline (epicardial 194.7 ± 41.9, endocardial 130.2 ± 29.2); 70% baseline‐flow (epicardial 160.4 ± 27.7, endocardial 112.1 ± 15.1); 30% baseline‐flow (epicardial 44.3 ± 5.5, endocardial 32.9 ± 9); 20 minutes reperfusion (epicardial 175.8 ± 33.6, endocardial 126.5 ± 30); 120 minutes reperfusion (epicardial 146.3 ± 31.1, endocardial 107.1 ± 29.7); and complete LAD occlusion (epicardial 10.5 ± 5.8 endocardial 1.4 ± 0.3) (r = 0.986–0.962, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This new blood pressure waveform‐triggered laser Doppler probe is able to measure RMBF at different depths online in the beating heart.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bierbach et al. (2012) studied Regional myocardial blood flow measurement (n=10). LVP-triggered laser Doppler vs. Fluorescent microspheres (MS) RMBF was evaluated on Correlation between Laser Doppler RMBF and MS RMBF (r = 0.986-0.962, p=< 0.001). A new blood pressure waveform-triggered laser Doppler probe strongly correlated with fluorescent microspheres for measuring regional myocardial blood flow in a porcine model (r = 0.986-0.962, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: