Key result
Concomitant CABG during ATAAD repair linked to ~9-fold higher operative mortality versus isolated repair.
Why the study?
The impact of concomitant CABG on operative and midterm mortality in patients undergoing surgical repair for acute type A aortic dissection was investigated.
Does concomitant CABG affect operative and midterm mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing surgical repair?
Cohort (n=489)
No
Does concomitant CABG affect operative and midterm mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing surgical repair?
Concomitant CABG during acute type A aortic dissection repair is associated with a 9-fold increased risk of operative mortality, though survivors have similar midterm outcomes to those undergoing isolated repair.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution selecting concomitant CABG in acute type A aortic dissection; leaves open causal effects versus selection bias for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the impact of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on operative and midterm mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) undergoing surgical repair. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2014, among 489 patients (mean age: 47.6 ± 10.4 years, 77.1% male) with ATAAD who received surgical repair at our institute, 21 patients (4.3%) underwent concomitant CABG. Isolated aortic repair was performed in the remaining 468 cases (95.7%). Coronary dissection was indicated in 15 patients (Neri classification type B in 2, type C in 13), concomitant coronary artery disease in five and coronary artery compression in one. The follow-up time was 97.3% at 44.1 ± 13.9 months. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients (9%) died from surgery, and operative mortality in the concomitant CABG group was significantly higher than that in the isolated aortic repair group (47.6%, 10/21 vs. 7.3%, 34/468; P < 0.001). Among the 11 survivors in the concomitant CABG group, no deaths occurred during the follow-up. Cox regression indicated that concomitant CABG increased the operative mortality risk by 9.2 times (HR, 9.26; 95% CI, 4.31-19.89; P < 0.001). Although it predicted a 5.2-fold increase in overall mortality (HR, 5.20; 95% CI, 2.55-10.61; P < 0.001), concomitant CABG did not affect midterm death (P = 0.996). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant CABG carries a significant operative risk in ATAAD patients undergoing surgical repair. However, survivors may benefit from concomitant CABG and had similar midterm mortality compared with the other cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) (n=489). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. Isolated aortic repair was evaluated on operative mortality (HR 9.26, 95% CI 4.31-19.89, p=< 0.001). Concomitant CABG during surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection increased operative mortality compared to isolated repair.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: