PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 12, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology157 citationsOpen Access

Cardiac surgery in the octogenarian: Perioperative outcome and clinical follow-up

WFWilliam K. FreemanHSHartzell V. SchaffPOPeter C. O’Brien

Key Result

Cardiac surgery in octogenarians was associated with a significantly better actuarial survival rate compared to age- and gender-matched control subjects (p = 0.037).

Key Points

  • Assess perioperative mortality, clinical outcomes, and long-term post-discharge survival in patients aged 80 and older undergoing cardiac surgery.
  • Evaluated 191 consecutive patients aged ≥80 years (39.8% NYHA class III, 57.1% class IV) undergoing cardiac surgery using extracorporeal circulation and cold cardioplegia between 1982 and 1986.
  • Tracked in-hospital mortality across elective and urgent surgical subgroups and conducted clinical follow-up in 155 hospital survivors for a mean of 22.6 ± 14.8 months.
  • Overall in-hospital mortality was 18.8% (30-day cardiac mortality: 15.7%), with lower rates for elective CABG (5.6%) and elective AVR (9.6%) compared to urgent operations (35.9%).
  • Increased perioperative mortality was associated with left ventricular failure, functional class IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, mitral valve intervention for severe regurgitation, and urgent surgery.
  • Surviving patients experienced marked symptomatic improvement, and actuarial survival of the entire surgical cohort significantly exceeded that of age- and gender-matched controls (p = 0.037).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=191)

PICO

P
Population
191 consecutive patients aged ≥80 years undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation, followed for a mean of 22.6 months.
E
Exposure / Comparator
Cardiac surgery vs Age- and gender-matched control subjects
O
Primary Outcome
Actuarial survival rate, p=0.037

Main Result

p-value: p=0.037

Abstract

The perioperative and follow-up results of cardiac operations employing extracorporeal circulation and cold cardioplegic arrest were examined in 191 consecutive patients greater than or equal to 80 years of age having surgery over a 5 year period (1982 to 1986). Most patients had severe preoperative symptoms with functional class III (39.8%) or IV (57.1%) limitation. The overall 30 day postoperative cardiac mortality rate was 15.7%. The total in-hospital mortality rate was 18.8%; the mean postoperative hospital stay was 16.4 +/- 13.3 days. The perioperative mortality rate for elective operations was as follows: coronary artery bypass (5.6%), aortic valve replacement (9.6%), aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass (17.9%) and mitral valve surgery with or without coronary bypass (21.4%). Urgent operations were performed in 39 patients (20.4%) with a total perioperative mortality rate of 35.9%; urgent coronary artery bypass was performed in 26 patients (67%) with an in-hospital mortality rate of 23.1%. Clinical evidence of left ventricular failure, functional class IV symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%, mitral valve repair or replacement for severe mitral regurgitation and urgent operation were associated with an increased perioperative mortality rate. Follow-up study in all 155 patients surviving postoperative hospitalization at 22.6 +/- 14.8 months showed significant improvement in symptom status in all surgical subgroups. There were 18 follow-up deaths (11.6%); 10 were noncardiac. The actuarial survival rate of the entire study group was significantly better than that in age- and gender-matched control subjects (p = 0.037).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Freeman et al. (1991) conducted a cohort in Cardiac surgery in octogenarians (n=191). Cardiac surgery vs. Age- and gender-matched control subjects was evaluated on Actuarial survival rate (p=0.037). Cardiac surgery in octogenarians was associated with a significantly better actuarial survival rate compared to age- and gender-matched control subjects (p = 0.037).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa56d5320e5356c66b27d6dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80212-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper