Key result
Adding motivational interviewing to brief strategic therapy fails to improve cardiac rehab outcomes.
Why the study?
Does Brief Strategic Therapy combined with Motivational Interviewing improve biomedical and psychological outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation inpatients compared to Brief Strategic Therapy alone?
RCT (n=42)
Single-blind
Randomly permuted blocks
No
Does Brief Strategic Therapy combined with Motivational Interviewing improve biomedical and psychological outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation inpatients compared to Brief Strategic Therapy alone?
Combining Brief Strategic Therapy with Motivational Interviewing did not show incremental efficacy over Brief Strategic Therapy alone for biomedical or psychological outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Adding motivational interviewing to brief strategic therapy yields no incremental benefit; confirms single-modality psychological intervention suffices in cardiac rehabilitation.
Background: Psychological distress, biomedical parameters and unhealthy lifestyles contribute to a poorer prognosis for cardiac disease. Public health’s challenge is to motivate patients to utilize self-care. Objective: This prospective, randomized, single-blind pilot study aimed at testing the incremental efficacy of Brief Strategic Therapy (BST) combined with Motivational Interviewing (MI) in improving selected biomedical and psychological outcomes over and beyond those of the stand-alone BST in a residential Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) program. Method: 42 inpatients (17 females), enrolled in a 1-month CR program, were randomly allocated into two conditions: a) 3 sessions of BST and b) 3 sessions of BST plus MI. Data were collected at baseline, discharge, and after 3 months through phone interviews. Results: At discharge, no significant between-group difference was found in any outcome variable. Changes from pre- to post-treatment within each condition showed significant improvements only in the BST group, where the level of external regulation diminished, and both the participants’ self-regulation (Relative Autonomous Motivation Index, RAI) and willingness to change improved. At the 3-month follow-up, within-group analyses on responders (BST=9; BST+MI=11) showed a statistically significant improvement in the level of systolic blood pressure in both groups. Discussion: Findings showed no evidence of the incremental efficacy of combining BST and MI over and beyond BST alone on either selected biomedical or psychological outcomes among CR patients. Conclusions: Ends and limitations from the present pilot study should be considered and addressed in future investigations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietrabissa et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Cardiovascular Disease (n=42). Brief Strategic Therapy (BST) combined with Motivational Interviewing (MI) vs. Brief Strategic Therapy (BST) alone was evaluated on Relative Autonomous Motivation Index (RAI) at discharge and weight reduction at 3 months. Combining Brief Strategic Therapy with Motivational Interviewing did not significantly improve biomedical or psychological outcomes compared to Brief Strategic Therapy alone among cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: