Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
S-1 is an oral combined form of 1 M tegafur [a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)], 0.4 M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (a reversible inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase) and 1 M potassium oxonate (an inhibitor of orotate phosphoribosyltransferase). S-1 has been shown to exert a potent antitumor effect with low gastrointestinal toxicity in experimental tumor models. We have therefore compared the antitumor effect of oral S-1 with that of continuous infusion of 5-FU in rats bearing transplants of human and murine tumors. Almost complete inhibition of the tumor growth was obtained on 7 day schedules in Yoshida sarcoma-bearing rats by consecutive administration of 30 mg/kg/day of oral S-1 and 40 mg/kg/day infusion of 5-FU. However, a significant difference between the incidence of toxicities of S-1 and 5-FU, including body weight loss and diarrhea, was noted. The rats given the 5-FU infusion had marked weight loss and severe diarrhea, while those given oral S-1 had neither. Although about 50% inhibition of the tumor growth was attained with 15 mg/kg/day of oral S-1 and 30 mg/kg/day infusion of 5-FU in nude rats with xenografted human colon cancer (KM12C), the rate of body weight loss in the 5-FU-treated group was distinctly higher than in the S-1-treated group. The ratio of the 5-fluoronucleotide concentrations in gastrointestinal tissue to that in the tumor was lower in the S-1-treated rats than in the 5-FU-treated rats. In conclusion, the results suggest that oral S-1 might be more effective in the treatment of cancer patients than continuous infusion of 5-FU, from the standpoint of antitumor potency and toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukushima et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: