Key result
Endovascular repair achieves 1-year survival in a case of secondarily ruptured AAA.
Case Report (n=1)
Endovascular repair is a feasible and successful treatment option for secondarily ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms following EVAR failure in multimorbid patients.
Supports endovascular salvage for post-EVAR rupture in selected cases; leaves open broader applicability and durability pending larger studies.
We report the successful endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a multimorbid patient 8 months after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). A 74-year-old man with a history of EVAR 8 months earlier presented with hypotension, severe back pain, and tenderness on abdominal palpation. A contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan showed a large retroperitoneal hematoma and confirmed the diagnosis of secondary abdominal aortic rupture. Because the patient had severe comorbidities, the endovascular method was chosen for further management. Two stent grafts were placed appropriately to eliminate a type 1a and a type 3 endoleak owing to modular separation of the left iliac graft limb from the main body stent graft. An additional self-expanding stent was deployed in the solitary right renal artery to open its origin, which was partially overlapped by the proximal cuff. The patient was discharged on the tenth postoperative day and is alive and well 1 year postoperatively. This case indicates that endovascular repair is feasible not only in cases of primarily ruptured AAAs but also in secondarily ruptured AAAs after failure of EVAR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klonaris et al. (2007) conducted a case report in Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm following EVAR (n=1). Endovascular repair was evaluated on Successful repair and survival. Endovascular repair was successfully used to treat a secondarily ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a 74-year-old man, who remained alive and well at 1 year postoperatively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: