Key result
Interscalene block below C6 prolongs onset vs supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches, risking phrenic nerve palsy.
Why the study?
Does interscalene block below the C6 nerve root improve surgical effectiveness or ease of performance compared to supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches in adults undergoing upper limb surgery?
Population
60 adult patients (ASA grade 1 to 3) undergoing upper limb (upper arm and forearm) surgery.
Comparison
Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus… vs Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular or…
Design
RCT, Randomly allocated into three groups, Observer-blinded
Authors
Loading...
Interscalene block below C6 delays onset and risks phrenic palsy; challenges its use versus supraclavicular or infraclavicular approaches.
RCT (n=60)
Observer-blinded
Randomly allocated
Does interscalene block below the C6 nerve root improve surgical effectiveness or ease of performance compared to supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches in adults undergoing upper limb surgery?
Interscalene block below the C6 nerve root has a longer onset time and higher risk of phrenic nerve palsy compared to supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches for upper limb surgery.
Bharti et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Upper limb surgery (n=60). Interscalene block below the C6 nerve root vs. Supraclavicular and infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks was evaluated on Ease of performance and surgical effectiveness (imaging and block performance time, onset time, success rate, duration of block, and duration of postoperative analgesia). Interscalene block below C6 had a significantly longer onset time than supraclavicular and infraclavicular approaches, and caused clinically detectable phrenic nerve palsy in 2 patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: