Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hydraulic conductivities of Houston Black clay were measured in two field basins, in 73‐cm and 21‐cm diameter undisturbed cores, and in small cores prepared from sieved soil. Conductivities averaged about 2.5 cm/day for the field basins, about 0.3 cm/day for the undisturbed cores, and 0.1 cm/day for the disturbed soil cores. After steady‐state flow through the larger, undisturbed cores was obtained, water tagged with fluorescein was used to displace water in the cores until tagged water first appeared in the effluent. Examination of cross sections of the cores at different depths showed distinctive isolated areas where tagged water was present in the soil pores. The results imply that most water contained within structural units was inactive in the flow process compared to water flow around the units. The core walls apparently cut off some large pores associated with the soil structure, causing the decreased conductivities. Therefore, only field‐determined hydraulic conductivities are appropriate for use when predicting water flow in natural profiles of a swelling clay soil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ritchie et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: