Key result
Combined high fQRS-T angle and PLR linked to ~218% higher ischemic cardiomyopathy risk post-STEMI.
Why the study?
Data are limited on the predictive significance for ischemic cardiomyopathy of combining frontal plane QRS-T angle and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in STEMI compared with either marker alone.
Does the combination of fQRS-T and PLR predict the development of ischemic cardiomyopathy in STEMI patients better than either marker alone?
Cohort (n=638)
Does the combination of fQRS-T and PLR predict the development of ischemic cardiomyopathy in STEMI patients better than either marker alone?
The combination of fQRS-T and PLR on admission serves as a reliable and cost-effective prognosticator for the development of ischemic cardiomyopathy following STEMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support post-STEMI risk stratification; hypothesis-generating for combined markers, requiring prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Frontal plane QRS-T angle (fQRS-T) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are highly important parameters that well-predict unfavorable outcomes in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI).There are limited data on the predictive significance of ischemic cardiomyopathy (I-CMP) from the combination of fQRS-T and PLR in STEMI, compared to using fQRS-T and PLR alone. AIM: We aimed to evaluate the ability of the combination of fQRS-T and PLR routinely obtained on admission to identify STEMI patients at risk of I-CMP. METHOD: Six hundred and thirty-eight consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between 2018 and 2021 were included. The assessment of I-CMP was conducted through two-dimentional (2D)-echocardiography 6 weeks post-STEMI and I-CMP was defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50% or less. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis were performed to predict the development of I-CMP. RESULTS: In ROC analysis, the cut-off values of fQRS-T and PLR for best predicting I-CMP were 66.72° and 101.23, respectively. The model using the combination of two markers was the most powerful predictor of I-CMP risk (OR: 3.183, 95% CI: 1.971-5.139, p = .001) when included in a single variable such as high fQRS-T or high PLR (OR: 1.422, 95% CI: 0.870-0.232, p = .160). Additionally, the concomitant presence of high fQRS-T and high PLR exhibited the highest specificity (77%) for I-CMP relative to the individual presence of high fQRS-T (66%) or PLR (49%). CONCLUSION: The combination of fQRS-T and PLR, which is a simple and cost-effective risk assessment, may serve as a more reliable prognosticator for I-CMP as opposed to the use of fQRS-T and PLR alone for STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çöllüoğlu et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=638). Combination of high frontal plane QRS-T angle and high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio vs. High fQRS-T or high PLR alone was evaluated on Ischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF ≤ 50%) (OR 3.183, 95% CI 1.971-5.139, p=.001). The combination of high frontal plane QRS-T angle and high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio strongly predicted ischemic cardiomyopathy risk in STEMI patients (OR 3.183; 95% CI 1.971-5.139; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: