Key result
Twice daily reviparin cuts symptomatic recurrent DVT/PE ~78% versus intravenous unfractionated heparin at 3 weeks.
Why the study?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin) improve inhibition of in vivo thrombin generation compared to unfractionated heparin in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis?
RCT (n=1,048)
randomized
Yes
Does low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin) improve inhibition of in vivo thrombin generation compared to unfractionated heparin in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis?
Twice daily reviparin with vitamin K antagonists is more effective at inhibiting in vivo thrombin generation than intravenous unfractionated heparin in acute DVT.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports reviparin over UFH for acute DVT; confirms LMWH benefit in reducing early VTE recurrence.
Low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparins are frequently used to treat venous thromboembolism, but it is not known whether they are equally effective in inhibiting in vivo generation of thrombin. In this multicenter trial, 1048 patients were randomized to intravenous unfractionated heparin (group A), twice daily low-molecular-weight heparin (reviparin) for 1 week (group B), or once daily reviparin for 4 weeks (group C). All patients received vitamin K antagonists. Blood samples withdrawn at the baseline and at weeks 1 and 3 were analyzed using markers of in vivo thrombin generation and other coagulation parameters. During the first 3 weeks symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis-pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) occurred in 17 (4.5%) of 375 patients in group A compared with 4 (1.0%) of 388 patients in group B, and 9 (2.4%) of 374 patients in group C. Forty percent of patients in group A, 53.4% in group B, and 53.5% in group C showed 30% or greater reduction in thrombus size assessed by venography. Patients in group B had significantly greater reduction in D-dimer, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 (F1 + 2), endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), and thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complexes compared to groups A and C. Greater release of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and reduction in levels of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) and fibrinogen were significantly more pronounced in group C patients. Reviparin administered twice daily plus vitamin K antagonist is more effective in inhibiting in vivo thrombin generation compared to intravenous unfractionated heparin plus vitamin K antagonist, and reviparin once daily produced significantly higher TFPI release and greater reduction in TAFI and fibrinogen levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kakkar et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in acute deep vein thrombosis (n=1,048). Reviparin vs. intravenous unfractionated heparin was evaluated on symptomatic recurrent deep vein thrombosis-pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) during the first 3 weeks. Twice daily reviparin for 1 week reduced symptomatic recurrent DVT/PE to 1.0% compared to 4.5% with intravenous unfractionated heparin at 3 weeks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: