Key result
Routine CTA-derived 3D thoracic aortic strain analysis is feasible and correlates with aortic stenosis severity.
Why the study?
Is 3D thoracic aorta principal strain analysis from routine ECG-gated CTA feasible and correlated with disease severity in patients undergoing TAVR?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
No
Is 3D thoracic aorta principal strain analysis from routine ECG-gated CTA feasible and correlated with disease severity in patients undergoing TAVR?
p-value: p=<0.001
Three-dimensional thoracic aorta principal strain analysis from routine ECG-gated CTA is clinically feasible and correlates with hemodynamic severity in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.
May facilitate aortic strain assessment via routine CTA in aortic stenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Functional impairment of the aorta is a recognized complication of aortic and aortic valve disease. Aortic strain measurement provides effective quantification of mechanical aortic function, and 3-dimenional (3D) approaches may be desirable for serial evaluation. Computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) is routinely performed for various clinical indications, and offers the unique potential to study 3D aortic deformation. We sought to investigate the feasibility of performing 3D aortic strain analysis in a candidate population of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: Twenty-one patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) referred for TAVR underwent ECG-gated CTA and echocardiography. CTA images were analyzed using a 3D feature-tracking based technique to construct a dynamic aortic mesh model to perform peak principal strain amplitude (PPSA) analysis. Segmental strain values were correlated against clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables. Reproducibility analysis was performed. RESULTS: and mean AS pressure gradient (MG) 44±11 mmHg. CTA-based 3D PPSA analysis was feasible in all subjects. Mean PPSA values for the global thoracic aorta, ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta segments were 6.5±3.0, 10.2±6.0, 6.1±2.9 and 3.3±1.7%, respectively. 3D PSSA values demonstrated significantly more impairment with measures of worsening AS severity, including AVA and MG for the global thoracic aorta and ascending segment (p<0.001 for all). 3D PSSA was independently associated with AVA by multivariable modelling. Coefficients of variation for intra- and inter-observer variability were 5.8 and 7.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional aortic PPSA analysis is clinically feasible from routine ECG-gated CTA. Appropriate reductions in PSSA were identified with increasing AS hemodynamic severity. Expanded study of 3D aortic PSSA for patients with various forms of aortic disease is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satriano et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Severe aortic valve stenosis (n=21). 3D thoracic aorta peak principal strain amplitude (PPSA) analysis using ECG-gated CTA was evaluated on Correlation of 3D peak principal strain amplitude with aortic valve area and mean pressure gradient (p=<0.001). Three-dimensional thoracic aorta peak principal strain amplitude analysis from routine ECG-gated CTA was feasible and demonstrated significant impairment with worsening aortic stenosis severity (p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: