Demonstrates robust neutralizing antibody responses and acceptable safety of JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 in adults, supporting updated seasonal vaccine formulations.
COVID-19 remains a substantial burden in vulnerable populations, including older adults and immunocompromised individuals. It was recommended that 2024–2025 COVID-19 vaccine formulations should target a monovalent JN.1 lineage. Here we provide preliminary data on the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a monovalent Omicron JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 vaccine. Fifty-three healthy adults ≥18 years old (18–55 years, n = 27; >55 years, n = 26) were vaccinated with Omicron JN.1-adapted BNT162b2. Primary safety endpoints were local reactions and systemic events through 7 days, adverse events (AEs) through 1 month, and serious AEs through 6 months; safety data through 1 month are presented here. Serum 50 % neutralizing titers against Omicron JN.1, KP.2, and KP.3, as well as XBB.1.5 were measured at baseline and 1 month after vaccination. Immunogenicity was also compared to a group who received monovalent XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2 in a previous substudy of this trial matched by age and baseline SARS-CoV-2 infection status to current substudy participants. There were no new safety signals; local reactions and systemic events through 7 days of vaccination were generally mild to moderate in severity, and AEs were infrequent. One month after vaccination, JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 induced neutralizing titers against Omicron JN.1, KP.2, and KP.3 that were higher than those induced by XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2. In the JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 group, GMTs were generally similar for the 18–55- and >55-year-old age groups. Collectively, these safety and immunogenicity data support administration of JN.1 lineage-adapted vaccines for the 2024–2025 season. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05997290 • WHO recommended that 2024–25 COVID-19 vaccines should target monovalent Omicron JN.1 lineages. • A safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity study of JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. • JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile with no new safety signals. • JN.1-adapted BNT162b2 induced robust neutralizing responses to JN.1, KP.2, and KP.3 • Neutralizing titers against JN.1 lineages were higher than with XBB.1.5-adapted BNT162b2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: