Key result
Anterior mitral leaflet reconstruction yields similar 10-year reoperation rates versus MV repairs without anterior procedures.
Why the study?
Do anterior leaflet reconstructive procedures during mitral valve repair adversely affect long-term freedom from reoperation compared to repair without anterior leaflet procedures?
Population
558 consecutive patients undergoing Carpentier-type mitral valve repair, including 156 patients requiring…
Comparison
Anterior mitral leaflet reconstructive… vs Mitral valve repair without anterior leaflet…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
5 and 10 years
Authors
Loading...
Observational data associate anterior leaflet reconstruction with comparable durability; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before wider adoption.
Cohort (n=558)
Do anterior leaflet reconstructive procedures during mitral valve repair adversely affect long-term freedom from reoperation compared to repair without anterior leaflet procedures?
Absolute Event Rate: 81.2% vs 84.4%
Anterior leaflet reconstructive procedures during mitral valve repair yield immediate and long-term results comparable to procedures without anterior leaflet involvement, demonstrating that aggressive repair of anterior leaflet disease is safe and durable.
Grossi et al. (1995) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve disease (n=558). Anterior mitral leaflet reconstructive procedures vs. Mitral valve repair without anterior leaflet procedures was evaluated on Freedom from reoperation at 10 years. Anterior mitral leaflet reconstructive procedures during mitral valve repair yielded similar 10-year freedom from reoperation compared to repairs without anterior leaflet procedures (81.2% vs 84.4%).
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: