Key result
Active tDCS during early abstinence reduces 1-month alcohol relapse ~50% versus sham.
Why the study?
Brain-based interventions are needed to address persistent relapse in alcohol use disorder, and whether non-invasive neuromodulation during early abstinence modulates addiction network connectivity and improves relapse rates was unknown.
Does active tDCS reduce relapse rates and improve addiction network connectivity in short-term abstinent AUD participants?
RCT (n=60)
Double-blind
Randomized
No
Does active tDCS reduce relapse rates and improve addiction network connectivity in short-term abstinent AUD participants?
p-value: p=0.012
Active tDCS delivered during early abstinence may modulate addiction network connectivity and reduce short-term relapse rates in alcohol use disorder.
tDCS during early AUD abstinence warrants clinical consideration; extends neuromodulation evidence to relapse prevention.
Background Brain-based interventions are needed to address persistent relapse in alcohol use disorder (AUD). Neuroimaging evidence suggests higher fronto-striatal connectivity as well as higher within-network connectivity of theoretically defined addiction networks is associated with reduced relapse rates and extended abstinence during follow-up periods. Objective/Hypothesis A longitudinal randomized double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial investigated whether a non-invasive neuromodulation intervention delivered during early abstinence can (i) modulate connectivity of addiction networks supporting abstinence and (ii) improve relapse rates. Hypotheses: Active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) will (i) increase connectivity of addiction networks known to support abstinence and (ii) reduce relapse rates. Methods Short-term abstinent AUD participants (n=60) were assigned to 5 days of either active tDCS or sham during cognitive training. Causal discovery analysis (CDA) examined the directional influence from left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC, stimulation site) to addiction networks that support abstinence. Results Active tDCS had an effect on the average strength of CDA-determined connectivity from LDLPFC to the incentive salience and negative emotionality addiction networks - increasing in the active tDCS group and decreasing in the sham group. Active tDCS had an effect on relapse rates 1-month following the intervention, with lower probability of relapse in the active tDCS vs. sham groups. Active tDCS showed an unexpected sex-dependent effect on relapse rates. Conclusion Our results suggest that LDLPFC stimulation delivered during early abstinence has an effect on addiction networks supporting abstinence and on relapse rates. The unexpected sex-dependent neuromodulation effects need to be further examined in larger clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camchong et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Alcohol use disorder (AUD) (n=60). Active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) vs. Sham stimulation was evaluated on Relapse rate at 1-month follow-up (p=0.012). Active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered over 5 days during early abstinence reduced the probability of alcohol relapse by half at 1 month compared to sham stimulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: