This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) severely hinders cognitive function in the hippocampus (HP) and subiculum (SUB), impacting the expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) such as the α7-subtype. To investigate α7 nAChRs as a potential PET imaging biomarker, we report the quantitative binding of [125I]α-Bungarotoxin ([125I]α-Bgtx) for binding to postmortem human AD (n = 29; 13 males, 16 females) HP compared to cognitively normal (CN) (n = 28; 13 male, 15 female) HP. Methods: For comparisons with common AD biomarkers, adjacent slices were anti-Aβ and anti-Tau immunostained for analysis using QuPath. Results: The [125I]α-Bgtx average SUB/HP ratio was 0.5 among the CN subjects, suggesting higher [125I]α-Bgtx binding in the HP gray matter regions. The AD subjects showed overall less binding than the CN subjects, with no statistical significance. A positive correlation was found in the [125I]α-Bgtx binding in the AD subjects as the age increased. The Braak stage comparisons of [125I]α-Bgtx were made with [18F]flotaza binding to Aβ plaques and [125I]IPPI binding to Tau. A positive correlation was found between [125I]α-Bgtx and [18F]flotaza and there was a negative correlation between [125I]α-Bgtx and [125I]IPPI, implicating intricate relationships between the different AD biomarkers. Conclusions: [125I]α-Bgtx shows complimentary potential as a α7 nAChR imaging agent but needs more preclinical assessments to confirm effectiveness for translational PET studies using α7 nAChR radioligands.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ngo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: