Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This open-label multi-centre study evaluated a new intravenous immunoglobulin, Gammaplex®, in the treatment of 50 patients with primary immunodeficiency and significant hypogammglobulinaemia. Patients treated previously with other intravenous immunoglobulins received Gammaplex® on their same infusion schedule for 1 year; 22 were on a 21-day and 28 on a 28-day regimen (300-800 mg/kg/infusion). There were no serious, acute bacterial infections, whereas six subjects (12·0%) had at least one such infection in the 6 months before enrollment. Forty subjects (80·0%) had at least one non-serious infection; the median number of infective episodes per subject per year was 3·07. Antibiotics were taken by 38 subjects therapeutically and prophylactically by 16 at some time. Fewer than half (46·0%) missed any time off work or school because of infection or other illness. Trough immunoglobulin (Ig)G levels were above 6·00 g/l in all subjects at all assessments after 15 weeks with two exceptions. Overall, 21·2% of infusions were associated with an adverse event up to 72 h after infusion. The frequency of adverse events increased with infusion rate. Headache was the most common product-related adverse event (7·5% of 703 infusions). In conclusion, Gammaplex® is effective in primary immunodeficiency and is well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moy et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: