Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the past two decades, several experimental and simulation studies have proposed simple empirical relations between projected two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) structural properties of fractal-like aggregates in the cluster–dilute regime. These empirical relations have found extensive use in inferring the 3-D structural properties of aggregates from their projected (i.e., 2-D) properties—measurable from aggregate electron microscopy images. This study probes the limitations and nongeneralizability of these simple and straightforward empirical relationships and proposes replacing them with new empirical formulas. A straightforward empirical relationship for directly determining the 3-D fractal dimension (Df ) of an aggregate from the knowledge of its 2-D aspect ratio is also identified. These new relationships were derived by comparing the ratios of several 2-D and 3-D structural properties of a statistically significant number of simulated aggregates with point-contacting monomers as a function of their 3-D Df ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 in increments of 0.1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakrabarty et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: